# Ordering Decimals

*"Could I have a 3.65 and an 0.8, please ... ?"
NO, not THAT type of ordering. I mean putting them in order ...*

Ordering decimals can be tricky. Because often we look at 0.42 and 0.402 and say that 0.402 must be bigger because there are more digits. But no!

We can use this method to see which decimals are bigger:

- Set up a table with the
**decimal point in the same place**for each number. - Put in each number.
- Fill in the
**empty squares with zeros**. - Compare using the
**first column**on the left - If the digits are equal move to the
**next column**to the right until one number wins.

If you want |
||

If you want descending order you always pick the largest first |

## Example: Put the following decimals in ascending order:

1.506, 1.56, 0.8

In a table they look like this:

Ones | Decimal
Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |

1 | . | 5 | 0 | 6 |

1 | . | 5 | 6 | |

0 | . | 8 |

### Fill in the empty squares with zeros:

Ones | Decimal
Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |

1 | . | 5 | 0 | 6 |

1 | . | 5 | 6 | 0 |

0 | . | 8 | 0 | 0 |

### Compare using the first column (Ones)

Two of them are "1"s and the other is a "0". Ascending order needs smallest first, and so "0" is the winner:

Answer so far: **0.8**

Now we can remove 0.8 from the list:

Ones | Decimal
Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |

1 | . | 5 | 0 | 6 |

1 | . | 5 | 6 | 0 |

- | . | - | - | - |

### Compare the Tenths

Now there are two numbers with the same "Tenths" value of 5, so move along to the "Hundredths" for the tie-breaker

### Compare the Hundredths

One of those has a 6 in the hundredths, and the other has a 0, so the 0 wins (remember we are looking for the smallest each time). In other words 1.506 is less than 1.56:

Answer so far: **0.8, 1.506**

Remove 1.506 from the list:

Ones | Decimal
Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |

- | . | - | - | - |

1 | . | 5 | 6 | 0 |

- | . | - | - | - |

Only one number left, it must be the largest:

Answer: **0.8, 1.506, 1.56**

Done!

## Example: Put the following decimals in DESCENDING order:

0.402, 0.42, 0.375, 1.2, 0.85

In a table they look like this:

Ones | Decimal
Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |

0 | . | 4 | 0 | 2 |

0 | . | 4 | 2 | |

0 | . | 3 | 7 | 5 |

1 | . | 2 | ||

0 | . | 8 | 5 |

And we want to go from **highest to lowest** (descending).

### Fill in the empty squares with zeros:

Ones | Decimal
Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |

0 | . | 4 | 0 | 2 |

0 | . | 4 | 2 | 0 |

0 | . | 3 | 7 | 5 |

1 | . | 2 | 0 | 0 |

0 | . | 8 | 5 | 0 |

### Compare using the first column (Ones):

There is a 1, all the rest are 0. Descending order needs largest first, so 1.2 must be the highest. (Write it down in your answer and cross it off the table).

Answer so far: **1.2**

Ones | Decimal
Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |

0 | . | 4 | 0 | 2 |

0 | . | 4 | 2 | 0 |

0 | . | 3 | 7 | 5 |

- | - | - | - | - |

0 | . | 8 | 5 | 0 |

### Compare the Tenths.

The 8 is highest, so 0.85 is next in value.

Answer so far: **1.2, 0.85**

Ones | Decimal
Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |

0 | . | 4 | 0 | 2 |

0 | . | 4 | 2 | 0 |

0 | . | 3 | 7 | 5 |

- | - | - | - | - |

- | - | - | - | - |

Now there are two numbers with the same "Tenths" value of 4, so move along to the "Hundredths" for the tie-breaker

One number has a 2 in the hundredths, and the other has a 0, so the 2 wins. So 0.42 is bigger than 0.402:

Answer so far: **1.2, 0.85, 0.42, 0.402**

Ones | Decimal
Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |

- | - | - | - | - |

- | - | - | - | - |

0 | . | 3 | 7 | 5 |

- | - | - | - | - |

- | - | - | - | - |

Only 0.375 left, so the answer is:

**Answer: 1.2, 0.85, 0.42, 0.402, 0.375**

### Game

Now, go practice with this special Decimal Ordering Game !